Now let`s see how the agreement goes over long distances: I also assume that several functional heads carry on them in a marathi clause, such as heads, Mood0, T0, etc. I assume that these are different aspects of participation and tense auxiliary officers in Marathi that have different contractual characteristics. This implies that several functional heads are independent, but the minimality makes them all agree with the same goal. I also assume that v0 does not contain a probe, because a naked verb does not have a concordance morphology. This contrasts with what prevails in the current literature. However, in my proposal, nothing depends decisively on it. If v0-sondes, the association of v0 with higher functional heads such as Asp0 and T0 in the syntax leads to display a specific morphological concordance pattern on the folded verb. The true mechanism of morphological manifestation is not decisive for my proposal and that is why I do not know it here. For the sake of simplicity, I also postpone the discussion on the mechanism that is linked to a double or second agreement. Let`s briefly see how the agreement is reached on a transit clause in Marathi. Chandra, Pritha.
2007. Agreement: Movement and rethought agreement. College Park, MD: University of Maryland thesis. Boeckx, Cedric. 2004. Remote contract in Hindi: some theoretical implications. Studia linguistica 58 (1). 23-36. DOI: doi.org/10.1111/j.0039-3193.2004.00108.x The connective verb does not take tension auxiliaries. But it is denied by a particularly unaffordable denial that ends up being done.
It is interesting to note that the “double chord” morpheme -s (2SG. SBJ) and the second morpheme-t̪ chord, which indicates the 3PL object, appear instead on the negation on the verb that is now present in a non-finistic form. 16In the absence of assistance to tension, the participant in the aspect expresses the current tense semantics as well as the demonstration agreement. In this case, the aspect head gets tense characteristics evaluated by T0 via Agree or by head movement in T0. It is possible to get the Phi features obtained by the T0 probe. I keep aside the mechanism itself that leads to this space limitation scheme. Note that the Morpheme system occurs with a double agreement when the 2SG applicant wears either a nominative or initiative case, but not if he is wearing dative cases. For this reason, the absence of a dual agreement in the subjunctive clause of the LDA is not obvious.
In (46.b), the -s on the subjunctive verb is due to the incompetent incarnate subject `of`. In LDA construction, the theme of the matrix is the only theme and dative door. Therefore, the morpheme for the 2SG subject is never displayed in the LDA context on a verb matrix or incorporated.