43 We find that the court was not mistaken in holding that Kaiser had committed unjust or false acts or practices by using the power of attorney and leasing lawyers to supposedly represent the record owners, to conceal the existence of the suction funds in front of the record owner and to obtain the overtaking. @Richard D, can district officers at least give you the names of people who have been overtaken? Most over-ageing games were undedified land that was not mortgaged. No other agreement, declaration or commitment made on the day or before this Agreement enters into force engages the parties. If, for whatever reason, a provision of this agreement is totally or partially unenforceable, the rest of the agreement is separable and will remain in force. Oct 01, 2014 You received a list from a country. A lot of time spent finding homeowners who lost their homes to tax the sale. Send a letter describing the procedure. Spending more time convincing them is not a scam. When I finally had several people accept my fee contract. I sent them the POA. When they return, I will send them the final document. Joseph Kaiser, which is G.
Hobus Investments LLC, Bobo Buys Real Estate LLC, Pre Flop LLC and Unclaimed Funds Inc. (Emperor Complex) was exploiting property owners facing foreclosure by wrongly proposing to save the property from enforced execution if the owner agreed to enter into an agreement granting Kaiser a stake in the property. The Attorney General, on behalf of the State of Washington, brought a enforcement action against Kaiser for violation of the Consumer Protection Act (CPA), Chapter 19.86 RCW, and sought declaratory and subordinate remedies. Kaiser is appealing the partial summary judgment decision that it legally violated the CPA by asking property owners who are subject to enforced execution, with false promises to save their property or dwelling, to induce homeowners to enter into unscrupulous and unfair agreements, emperors give ownership or control of their property, intercept taxpayers` money that should have been paid to landowners, use power and retain lawyers to recover over-indebtedness funds, act as both agents and beneficiaries of Land Trust Deals, and wrongly seek and induce former property owners to enter into agreements to obtain restitution funds. Kaiser also asserts that the Tribunal erred in authorizing evidence contrary to the terms of the agreements reached by the owners, concluding that the partial interest agreements were contrary to the CPA and that the question of whether four other real estate transactions were in the public interest of a violation of the CPA was ignored. We reject the emperor`s argument on appeal and confirm the partially summary judgment, the tribunal`s factual findings and legal findings, as well as the introduction of the abstention order. A potential or contingent agreement is a contract between a client and a lawyer who is paid on the basis of the provision of his services. The lawyer, instead of being paid by the hour, receives a portion of the total amount of funds raised by the other party after a transaction or judgment. This is often on 2 factors, 1) The client cannot afford to pay the lawyer per hour and 2) The lawyer`s share would exceed the amount if they were paid by the hour. What happens if the owner declared at the time of the tax sale has died? Whether they died at the time of the sale or died after the sale.
41 We find that the court did not rule on The right that Kaiser committed an unjust and deceptive act or practice in inducing landowners facing a tax foreclosure to enter into surtax contracts to sell the property in a tax-imposed sale and